The EESTor/theeestory Connection from Bloomberg Businessweeek

The EESTor/theeestory Connection from Bloomberg Businessweeek
The above is a screen capture from Bloomberg Businessweek July 10, 2010. The url was recently changed to eestor.us to make people believe there is no connection between EESTor and theestory.com, the #1 site of pumping EEStor on the internet. Update-EEStor's web site URL eestor.us has been deleted.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

"Verge of Threatening" More FOIA Material

It appears the blogger with the bag over his head who attended Notre Dame did not learn threatening, bullying, and name calling will not accomplish anything.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

INTERVIEW DENIED! More FOIA Material 10 11 12

I wonder who could have misquoted the AFRL official?  Could it have been a blogger with a bag over his head?



More FOIA Material 8 9

A Canadian investment bank FOIA request.

More FOIA Material 7

It's good to see a concerned skeptic emailing the AFRL after all the emails and phone calls they received from b/eestorblog/Brennan Joseph Murphy the EESTor news blogger and his "team" pumping EESTor.  Hopefully there will be a criminal investigation by the DOJ.  It should be easy for the FBI to trace the phone call from K St. to the AFRL office.



Monday, November 22, 2010

Tom Villars Did You Track Down the Paradigim Capital Visitor to EESTory.com?

Click here to read how Mr. Tom Villars LIED to DOE Chicago Office-Office of Chief Counsel.

As a self appointed securities law enforcer, did you make sure the Paradigim Capital visitor is not breaking any securities laws by visiting eestory.com and it's chat room?  If the visitor participated in chat, wouldn't that be a conflict of interest?  You should contact Paradigim's compliance officer and make sure the visitor did not break any company rules by visiting eestory.com, or could it be Paradigim encourages it's employees to visit eestory.com?  Interesting the Paradigim visitor also visited the eestory.com chat yesterday, Sunday.

Oh, and thanks for referring your visitor to my site.

Sunday, November 21, 2010

More FOIA Material 3 4 5 6

Take notes.  There's more tea leaves coming to this story.  It appears Baghead Brennan also known as "b", first made contact with AFRL August 2009.

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"....as has been claimed to have been accomplished by EESTOR Inc."
BULLSHIT!!!

Saturday, November 20, 2010

DOD Declined Funding EEStor..."Several tens of million"

Dick Weir must have believed DOD are suckers to ask for "Several tens of million" hand out .  The DOD employees are smarter than Dick Weir and Carl Nelson put together.

Friday, November 19, 2010

AFRL Email Baghead Brennan Joseph Murphy Did Not Want You To Read

I have underlined the highlights.  This AFRL person should be awarded the Congressional medal of Honor!!!

Many more AFRL emails to come. 

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Sandi National Lab Emails Coming Soon

The ClownBag/b/eestorblog/Baghead (Brennan Murphy) and TVillars will not be able to pull a stunt like they did with the Air Force Research Lab emails...posting the invite demo email first, but not posting any of the  damning emails of EESTor/Dick Weir, and the calling of Baghead a Clown till after when TV found out yours truly blogger will receive the same emails he received from the AFRL. 

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Baghead Brennan Joseph Murphy/B/eestorblog-Apologist and Enabler of Dick Weir's LIES

The following BS is from Baghead Brennan's blog March 20, 2009:

"The Department of Energy Released two Funding Announcements today which could be targeted by EEStor and it's partners. The first is a Electric Drive announcement and the second is a Battery manufacturing announcement. The total span amount of funding available is $1.475 Billion.Essentially, the DOE is providing grant funds to companies who apply and have projects deemed worthy of funding. The application would require the delivery of 50 cells manufactured using the materials described in an application to the DOE for inspection.  If EEStor pursues this funding, it will require them to reveal publicly where they stand with regard to their manufacturing capability because all applications for battery manufacturing have to include 50 cells to be submitted to the DOE for testing/inspection. ;-)  To the tin hats out there, it looks like we certainly may have stumbled upon a very good reason for EEStor delaying it's prototype announcement....because doing so may have jeopardized both the amount of funding Congress has put forward here and EEStor's ability to compete for it!"
Baghead, You're nothing but an apologist and enabler of Dick Weir's LIES.  

Dick/EESTor did not have one functional cell to submit to DOE back in 2009 and not one functional cell today!   
To the "tin hats", we know why Dick has been delaying EESTor's prototype announcement...because Dick never had one functional EESU!

Brennan, make sure you tell your boyz not to link, refer, or read my blog, Thank You.

Sandi National Lab emails coming soon!