|Lockheed CEO Bob Stevens. Source: Reuters.|
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Why Hasn't Lockheed Martin Fully Funded EESTor If They Believe in EESTor's BS?
Baghead Brennan and his team of EESTor pumpers have been claiming Lockheed Martin has received functional EESUs from EESTor. The pumpers also claim EESTor is worth >100 billion dollars USD with a functional EESU. If you believe Baghead, Dick Weir needs additional funding to "build out a production campus in the Austin, TX area", why hasn't Lockheed Martin fully funded EEStor?
Baghead, next time when you interview Lockheed CEO Bob Stevens, make sure you tell him you are Baghead Brennan Murphy the eestorblogger and say straight to Mr. Stevens face he is an "arrogant prick". You can also ask him why Lockheed Martin would not be interested in fully funding EESTor in order to increase LM's revenue >100 billion USD. Lockheed CEO Bob Stevens must be an idiot like all the skeptics of EESCAM, right Baghead Brennan Murphy?
Note:and Mort Topfer could have fully funded EEStor. They both decided not to. Why did they not fully fund EEStor if they had seen the "data" and walked away from a company that is going to be worth >100 billion dollars?